You're in a meeting explaining why the client's "simple" feature request would basically require rebuilding half the system. Their eyes glaze over. Someone asks, "Can't we just use WordPress?" And suddenly you're fighting the urge to launch into a 20-minute rant about scalability, security, and why their comparison makes no damn sense.
Can you relate?
As developers, we live in this weird space where we have to translate complex technical realities into language that non-technical people can actually understand. And honestly? Most of the time, we suck at it.
The Ego Trap (And Why Your Expertise Isn't Everything)
Your technical knowledge serves the project, not your need to be right.
It's stupidly easy to get caught up in feeling superior because someone doesn't understand the difference between a database and a spreadsheet. But that superiority complex? It's killing your projects before they even start.
I've watched developers tank entire client relationships because they couldn't resist explaining why the client's idea was "technically inferior." Meanwhile, the client is sitting there thinking, "I just want to know what this is going to cost me and when it'll be done."
Here's what they actually care about:
What is this going to cost my company?
How does this fit into our budget?
Will this actually solve our problem?
That's it. They don't give a shit about your elegant code architecture or why their suggestion goes against best practices. They hired you to be the expert so they don't have to think about that stuff.
Speaking Human (Not Developer)
Remember when you tried explaining APIs to your mom and she asked if it was like email? Instead of rolling your eyes, you should've said "kind of, yeah" and moved on. Because functionally, for her understanding, it was close enough.
Most clients are like your mom in that meeting. They understand business, they understand money, and they understand results. Your job isn't to make them into junior developers, it's to give them enough information to make good decisions.
Instead of: "We need to implement a microservices architecture with containerized deployment to ensure horizontal scalability."
Try: "We're building this so it can handle more users as your business grows, without everything crashing when you get popular."
The second version tells them what they need to know: it won't break when things go well.
When They Push Back (And They Will)
I've had clients who are sharp as hell business-wise but think every web project should start with a WordPress template. Instead of launching into a lecture about custom development, I learned to ask better questions:
"What's your main concern with a custom solution?" "What's driving the timeline on this?" "What happens if we can't deliver everything at once?"
Usually, it comes down to cost, timeline, or fear of complexity. All legitimate concerns that you can actually work with.
The WordPress Example: Client: "Why can't we just customize a WordPress theme? It'd be so much faster."
Wrong response: "WordPress isn't scalable for enterprise applications and introduces security vulnerabilities..."
Better response: "WordPress could work for getting something up quickly. The tradeoff is that when you want to add [specific feature they mentioned], we'll hit some walls. Want to talk about a phased approach where we start simple and build up?"
See the difference? You're not dismissing their idea, you're helping them understand the implications and offering alternatives.
That "F*ck This" Moment
There are going to be times when a client requests something that's technically insane. Like the time someone asked us to build a custom eCommerce application with a $30,000 budget and a two month timeline.
Your brain immediately goes to that place: "These people are idiots. They have no idea what they're asking for. This is impossible."
But here's the thing: that frustration is usually not about the request itself. It's about feeling like your expertise isn't being respected. And that's an ego problem, not a technical problem.
Instead of getting pissed off, try this approach:
"I love the ambition here. Let me break down what it would take to build something like that, and then we can talk about what's possible with your timeline and budget."
Then you educate without being condescending. Show them the scope, explain the phases, and help them understand why their original timeline won't work. Most reasonable people will appreciate the honesty.
The Long Game vs. Right Now
Clients live in quarterly reports and budget cycles. You live in "this will bite us in the ass two years from now." Both perspectives matter.
Sometimes the right technical decision isn't the right business decision. Maybe WordPress actually is the best choice because:
They have someone who knows how to update it
Their budget won't support custom development
They need something live next month, not next quarter
Your job isn't to force the "correct" technical solution. It's to make sure they understand the tradeoffs and can make an informed decision.
I've seen developers quit jobs over clients choosing WordPress over custom solutions. That's ego talking, not professionalism.
Strategies That Actually Work
1. Start with their problem, not your solution Before you explain anything technical, make sure you understand what they're actually trying to accomplish. Half the time, what they're asking for isn't what they actually need.
2. Use analogies they can relate to Building software is like construction, not magic. You need a foundation before you can add the fancy stuff. Sometimes you need to reinforce the structure before you can add another floor.
3. Show, don't just tell Mock up what you're talking about. Draw it on a whiteboard. Show them similar examples. Most people are visual learners, and abstract technical concepts make more sense when they can see them.
4. Acknowledge their constraints "I know budget is tight" or "I understand you need this live before the conference" shows that you're not just thinking about the technical side.
5. Offer phased approaches Instead of saying "that's impossible," try "here's what we can do in phase one, and here's how we'd build toward your bigger vision."
At the end of the day, successful projects aren't about having the cleanest code or using the latest framework. They're about solving real problems for real people within real constraints.
Your technical expertise is valuable, but it's only valuable if you can apply it in ways that actually help people accomplish their goals. Sometimes that means using WordPress. Sometimes it means building something custom. Sometimes it means telling a client their idea won't work and helping them find something better.
The developers who get this, who can check their egos and focus on solutions, those are the ones clients actually want to work with again.
Now I want to hear from you:
What's the most ridiculous client request you've ever gotten?
How do you handle pushback when you know the client's approach won't work?
What analogies do you use to explain technical concepts to non-technical people?
Drop your stories in the comments. Because let's be honest, we've all got war stories, and sometimes sharing them is the best way to learn from each other's mistakes.
Quote of the Day:
"We have two ears and one mouth so that we can listen twice as much as we speak." - Epictetus
👉 If you enjoy reading this post, feel free to share it with friends!
Or feel free to click the ❤️ button on this post so more people can discover it on Substack 🙏
You can find me on X and Instagram.
Also, I just launched in new YouTube channel - Code & Composure